Read For Yourself: Links About the Tina Peters Case

Read For Yourself: Links About the Tina Peters Case

My video “Debbie Delivers Truth About America: No Justice YET for Tina Peters” shares some important facts about the criminal prosecution, conviction, and sentencing of Tina Peters in Colorado for her role in uncovering evidence of manipulation of electronic voting machine data.

 

Tina Peters was not charged with changing election data or votes, or with compromising the data in the election machines, or interfering with an election, or any wrongdoing except for enabling “pictures” (forensic images) of election machine content to be taken. Those images were examined by cyber experts who concluded that there was indisputable evidence of the “unauthorized creation of new election databases” during early voting in both the 2020 presidential election and during a later municipal election. Their conclusions that corruption of the voting records was indisputable were published in a report referenced below called Mesa County Report #3.

 

Before pursuing the forensic images, Tina Peters asked relevant officials in her county to investigate when it was obvious that some election corruption had occurred, but those officials declined. She thought when the Mesa County Report #3 was released that those officials would then become interested and do something, but they didn’t.

 

There was no known investigation by any Colorado official of who created the unauthorized databases found in those electronic voting machines, when or how that tampering was done, and what impact that tampering had on the election outcomes. Instead the only official action was to prosecute the person who uncovered the evidence of wrongdoing.

 

References:

 

  • Read District Attorney talks the long and strange case of Tina Peters in which prosecutor Dan Rubenstein admits that “It didn’t really matter whether Dominion Voting Systems are reliable or not reliable or whether the elections were tampered with or not tampered with.” Please process: An official went to extraordinary lengths to massively overcharge an election official for uncovering proof of electronic voting machine tampering, but admits he does not care if the voting systems were tampered with.

 

  • The experts who analyzed the forensic images published their findings in what has become known as Mesa County Report #3, which you can read HERE. It is 87 pages long, but you can just read the Executive Summary to grasp the seriousness of what they uncovered, pages 3 to 5.

 

  • Check out HERE my interview with Tina Peters during her trial. She explains so much that matters about this case.