Let’s Open a National Discussion of HAMMER/Scorecard (Updated)

Let’s Open a National Discussion of HAMMER/Scorecard (Updated)

Context”.  That’s the one-word reminder that can’t be repeated too often as the 2020 presidential election is ‘decided’.  Because when context is taken into account, common sense suggests that as fraud-filled as Election Day vote-counting has been in Democrat-run cities and states—and is it ever fraud-filled—the real, monumental fraud was likely in the tabulation of nationwide early voting.

HAMMER and Scorecard are the names for software programs said to have been developed by American intelligence agencies for use in controlling the outcomes of elections through algorithms that adjust vote tabulation.  Their existence and their purpose do not appear to be denied or disputed; the only question is whether and when they have been deployed. (Update:  a friend says Dennis Montgomery is not to be trusted, which may make the story of HAMMER, per se, not credible.  But what HAMMER is described as capable of doing is essentially what was done in Texas in 2018…see below).

(UPDATE #2:  Within a matter of hours after this post went online, Attorney Sidney Powell was interviewed by Lou Dobbs, and spoke specifically about HAMMER and Scorecard.  You can watch the interview here.  Our post was based on gut instinct and a common sense read of ‘context’.  But knowing Ms. Powell, we have high confidence that she is not engaging in speculation–i.e., she has seen evidence.  The significance of her comments cannot be overstated.)

INSERT HERE space for the usual hyper-ventilating denouncement of all tin foil hat conspiracy theories.  And after the hyper-ventilating is done, take a deep breath, and again, consider context.

In the mid-term election of 2018, when early voting results were announced as soon as the polls closed, the political phenom known as “Beto” O’Rourke was on course to achieve a monumental upset of incumbent Senator Ted Cruz of Texas.  Election Day voting, however, swamped O’Rourke, and Cruz pulled out a 2.5% victory (after poll after poll prior to the election had Cruz comfortably ahead by 8-10 points or more).

Post-2018 election detective work exposed what had happened:  there was clear manipulation of the early voting tabulation.  It’s been openly described and discussed many times (here is a good place to start; follow the links within for more detail).  The technological validity of what was discovered—i.e., concurrence that what was alleged to have happened could indeed have happened in exactly the ways described–has been verified by independent IT experts.

Now let’s look at the ‘context’ of the 2020 election.

No honest, informed, objective, intelligent adult (“Adult”) could look at the totality of the Russia collusion hoax and fail to grasp the absolute determination of everyone involved—the mainstream media, the CIA under Brennan, the FBI under Comey, Mueller and his 18 partisan Democrat investigators, Adam Schiff—to tell any lie, fabricate any evidence, leak any untruth, intimidate any witness, and frame innocent people, if it would serve the purpose of getting Donald Trump out of the Presidency.

This is the mindset of opposition to the outsider Trump, whether it is grouped under the label ‘Deep State’, ‘ruling class’, ‘Uniparty’, mainstream media, entrenched bureaucracy, or under the old biblical term ‘rulers of men’.   Just call it the Enemy.  And their modus operandi?  No holds barred.  The end justifies any means.

The impeachment farce was Act 2, and reaffirmed every takeaway from the Russia collusion hoax.  Again, no Adult could look at the totality of evidence surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop—and the word is evidence, not allegation—and fail to see that impeaching Donald Trump for having expressed concern about Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine was a blatant attempt to turn the truth upside down…yet another example of no holds barred, any means justify the end tactics to get rid of the outsider Donald Trump.

Next up in ‘context’ is the pandemic.  It’s nearly perfect as a tactic to get rid of Trump, because good and decent people just cannot accept that it could be a tactic.  People have been sick!  People have died!  Of course this is true.  And it has been true for thousands of years that bad flus make people sick, and the infirm elderly often die from them.

But the shouting about the reality of covid as a sickness is obscuring the relentless accumulation of evidence that profoundly calls into question the legitimacy of shutdowns and masks and the mantra that ‘only a vaccine can save us’.  Mortality data and recovery data and effective therapy data are also shouting that institutional voices perpetuating fear (and prohibiting the use of verified therapies) are following a political agenda, not ‘science’.

But again, put aside noisy debate about disease and therapies.  Think again about context, and the Enemy.  “The pandemic was poorly handled by Trump!” is one useful dimension of the fear pandemic as a means to turn electoral attitudes against Trump.  But there’s a more important dimension.

But for the existence of the pandemic and its ‘fear clamor’ of quarantining and social distancing, there would have been no talk of using mail-in ballots in the 2020 election.  (If there were no mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, Donald Trump would have already been declared the winner.  The Election Day in person vote was decisive in favor of Trump; it’s the ‘keep counting’ efforts tied to mail-in ballots that have been central to moving every swing-state that was solidly for Trump on election night all in one way against him ever since).

So would the Enemy resort to use of an orchestrated campaign of sustained fear about a ‘pandemic’ to aid and abet election fraud via mail-in ballots that would serve the end of getting rid of Trump?

Well, no Adult could look at what the Enemy already did with the Russia collusion hoax and the impeachment and the pandemic management farce and be dismissive of this possibility.  The Enemy has made it overwhelmingly clear:  no holds barred; and the end justifies any means to get rid of Trump.  And if you think the pandemic’s appearance was a random occurrence, and everything that followed was simply rationally reactive and not planned, start with Event 201, and then do a study of Dr. Fauci’s bizarre behavior.

Now for a final dose of context, do just a brief review of Biden’s ‘popularity’ and apparent post-election data.  This is a man who is obviously suffering mentally, who barely campaigned, who never had a campaign event able to draw even 200 people.  This is a man who did not receive 95% of the black vote or anywhere near historical Democrat percentages of the overall minority vote.  (Decades of political wisdom has told Americans if the Democrats don’t get 95% of the black vote, they won’t win another election.)  Yet we are to believe not only that he won, but that he is simultaneously a man more popular—as measured by total votes—than ‘first black President’ Barack Obama in 2008 and ‘first woman President’ Hillary Clinton in 2016.

This is also an election where Republicans retained control of the Senate, and gained seats in the House—an embrace and affirmation of support of the Trump agenda and rejection of the Biden agenda.

This is also an election where pre-election polling—a device of the Enemy—was so wrong as to be outside a presumption of good faith error.  They were conditioning/suppression polls by the Enemy.

Which brings us back to HAMMER and Scorecard (or the same thing by another name).  The use of vote manipulation software on early voting results is tricky business, even when focused on only one race—the Presidential race.  It cannot generate results ate are too obviously suspect.  It must stay within the bounds of pre-election polls and expectations, and the 10-11 point polling lead Biden allegedly had gave them major leeway.  But as 2018 showed in Texas, the Election Day turnout can swamp the built-in early voting victory margin provided by the software.  With Trump’s very obvious populist popularity, the Enemy could not be sure how strong the Election Day turnout for Trump might be (which is why the mail in ballot mechanism was yet another necessary ‘insurance policy’).

Election Day turnout for Trump did in fact swamp the early voting fix, which is why all the states of Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin were strongly trending toward Trump victory on Election Night until all the vote counting was called off, and time was set aside to start rolling in the ‘found’ mail in ballots.  (And at this writing, it looks like the found mail-in ballots will be sufficient to have Biden declared the victor in enough states to nominally claim an Electoral College win).

___________

Americans know in their gut that an election result ‘installing’ President Joe Biden is fraudulent.  They will be lectured by the Enemy that their gut feelings are wrong, that there really were 70+ million Americans who hated Trump so badly that although they support his agenda, they voted for Biden because—despite monumental corruption and criminality evidenced by Hunter’s laptop (and censored by the Enemy)—he was clearly a nicer man.

Well, maybe.

But the context of the past four years screams total fraud.

Our guess is that HAMMER or Scorecard of some version thereof is at the root of the fraud, and that it infected and inflated early voting tallies in favor of Biden throughout the country.

Can we prove it?  Well, duh.  We don’t have the investigative powers to go beyond looking at context and applying common sense.

But the same can’t be said for the DOJ and FBI and the intelligence agencies.  If they want any chance at institutional redemption and public trust (are you listening, Bill Barr? John Ratcliffe?), they need to publicly take up the question of HAMMER and Scorecard and provide evidentiary proof based on rigorous investigation—not surface level ritual denial—that no such tampering occurred.

Because it’s our guess that the American people will not stand for an obviously stolen election, no matter how much the Enemy calls it legitimate and yells at them to accept it.

Nor should they.

Eric Georgatos blogs at America Can We Talk?

 

32 Comments
  • beeveedee
    Posted at 11:33h, 06 November Reply
    • Jim M Paul
      Posted at 14:46h, 11 November Reply

      The question is could an investigation into the voting machines prove that this happened and also prove the exact number of votes that were switched

  • bob jones
    Posted at 15:01h, 06 November Reply

    This is something that needs to be brought into the public’s eye. I haven’t heard one word of this on Talk radio, and I sent Seb Gorka an email about this. Not that he sees every email he gets, but I have to think that Talk Radio hosts know about this.

  • D3F1ANT
    Posted at 15:02h, 06 November Reply

    It’s a little late to close the barn doors now…

  • CPOUSNRET
    Posted at 15:47h, 06 November Reply

    This is the most amazing Communist b.s that has ever been inflicted on the American people.

  • Beemeth
    Posted at 21:41h, 06 November Reply

    If this is true, we can never have a fair election again.

  • Robert J. Russell
    Posted at 21:42h, 06 November Reply

    This is a problem we should have delt with long ago

  • Beemeth
    Posted at 21:43h, 06 November Reply

    If this is true, we can never have a fair election again. We also cannot trust that Democrats will come clean. This, election manipulation, would be an example of treason and therefore punishable by death!

  • Robert J. Russell
    Posted at 21:43h, 06 November Reply

    This is no B.S.

  • The Saint
    Posted at 21:47h, 06 November Reply

    Or it could just be old fashioned Democrat voter fraud. Roll in a few pallets of printed and filled out ballots in the middle of the night and just run them through the counting machines

  • Dennis Pedigo
    Posted at 22:34h, 06 November Reply

    I came here from Phil Valentine’s FB page so I’m sure he will be on the Radio about it tomorrow.

  • Nancy C Green
    Posted at 23:11h, 06 November Reply

    I would like to know how Biden took Trump’s 4% lead with another 1% count adding over 150,000 votes this happened in Wisconsin..
    after 4am. 4:00 a.m. Trump was up by almost 4%, with 94% of the.. vote tabulated.. the next morning at 95% of the vote in there was a hundred and twenty thousand votes added to Biden. And overtook Trump’s 4% lead. In Wisconsin.. how does 1% calculated votes overtake for a 4% lead? FRAUD.!!

  • Joe McCarty
    Posted at 00:11h, 07 November Reply

    Glad I mailed by ballot!!!!!

  • Tammui
    Posted at 01:37h, 07 November Reply

    Hammer and Scorecard.was just discovered in the Bloomberg Voting Machine in all the states in questions. This is going to indicate the President and go after the Coup Plotters

  • JGrimm
    Posted at 03:33h, 07 November Reply

    Your friend is fucking Retarded,
    Sydney Powel and General Tom McInerney did a bunch of interview right before Election night predicting with 100% accuracy exactly what was going to happen on election night.

  • Ronald Rutherford
    Posted at 04:27h, 07 November Reply

    https://youtu.be/ZfXC5R5h46k

    Sidney Powell just discussed Hammer on Lou Dobbs

  • Gary Kish
    Posted at 05:31h, 07 November Reply

    It’s going to be fine.

    The inventer (who turned whistleblower and brought 47 hard drives worth of proof) of HAMMER built a hidden trapdoor into the program. It records each use, the user ID, when, where and for what it was used for.

    He didn’t tell anyone about it.

    Flynn knew about it, which is why he had to be destroyed.

    This will all be disclosed after President Trump takes his case to the Supreme Court where (whoops) Amy was instated.

    The Dems walked into a trap. They’re screwed.

    • LJKelly
      Posted at 00:41h, 11 November Reply

      The Supreme Court rules on Constitutional issues, their deliberations aren’t conducted like a jury trial. If there IS evidence that can be presented (like ACTUAL PROOF) that shows that software was used to manipulate votes in this election, it has to be presented well before the issue reaches the Supreme Court. The Court will then rule if any provisions of the Constitution have been violated. Listening to Sidney Powell, she strongly suspects that Hammer / Scorecard were used, but she seems to lack any physical evidence to support her case. No matter how brilliant she is (and she is brilliant), she needs evidence that she can act on – and she needs it now.

      You present yourself as having some “insider” knowledge as to where and what this evidence is. I suggest that if you have it, you make the information public so someone like Powell can build a case around it. Respectfully, I’m guessing you don’t have this information and are offering false hope. I don’t have any evidence either – I wish I did. I would suggest that those of us who are sitting on the sidelines use the time we have to pray and place this in God’s hands. This is a turning point, and the future of our nation is at stake.

      • Shawn Richard McCoy
        Posted at 10:03h, 11 November Reply

        Echo Echo Echo: thegatewaypundit.com by Joe Hoft. PHD from MIT analyises data from machine. Trump votes switched to Biden.

      • Shawn Richard McCoy
        Posted at 11:32h, 11 November Reply

        How would you go about auditing the voting ballots for the 6th-battle?

  • michael black
    Posted at 05:43h, 07 November Reply

    i truly feel this pandemic was there last ditch effort to get rid of PRESIDENT TRUMP bye using mail in ballets there trying to tell us that 74,000,000 people voted for Joe biden that has never been done in US history …….tHIS GUY COULDNT EVEN GET PEOPLE TO SHOW UP TO HIS RALLYS also want to point out that Hilary clinton out performed biden in EVERY STATE OTHER THAN WISCONSIN,GEORGIA,PENNSYLVANIA, AND ARIZONA I HAVE LOST ALL HOPE AND FAITH IN THE WAY OUR COUNRTY WORKS

  • Goddess Bennu
    Posted at 07:23h, 07 November Reply

    Hammer is real and has been updated regularly by several agencies. The good think about this code is it can’t be extracted without rebuilding the entire system /network- There were “bread crumbs” built in to walk back if needed – at least thats the way it was in the late 1990’s.

  • Timothy Wieboldt
    Posted at 08:40h, 07 November Reply

    Well as I see it the main news agencies will not be reporting on this. Again they will be calling this fake news and not reporting with out investigating. This is deviating news for the Democratic party and might cause further civil unrest through out the USA. The last 4 years has been a hell of a roller-coaster ride with all the allegations against President Trump. I just hope this one is solved before Christmas 2020.

  • Mark Zysk
    Posted at 10:54h, 07 November Reply

    Here is what you are talking about

    https://theamericanreport.org/category/home/the-hammer/

    Please share with al, asl I do not have smart phone facebook or twitter which would be shut down any way.

  • Kelly
    Posted at 12:07h, 07 November Reply

    My thought is if Giuliani can get enough evidence for voter fraud from one state, ie PA, which he is doing now, be able to do a recount of the votes in that state, without using the Hammer Scorecard tabulating system and then see those counts change towards Trump. That is the first step..then the other states come into question and so on and so on..It reminds me of when someone is called in question for a crime but police pull them in on anything like a bench warrant, unpaid parking ticket. THEN the specific in depth investigation begins. The news would really have to get out. This is too suspect that the SAME EXACT STATES where this system is was in question and the President was winning and then all of a sudden he wasn’t…makes no sense and then it makes a lot of sense how all the tides turned to the left.

  • Connie Scruton
    Posted at 13:00h, 07 November Reply
  • Mark Zysk
    Posted at 15:52h, 07 November Reply

    In Michigan Antrim co. the program got greedy and changed an upload to fast so was caught only in one of the 64 counties using the same hardware.
    This is an example of it in action

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/3PUpbMyrOtjF/

  • Shawn Richard McCoy
    Posted at 19:25h, 07 November Reply

    Shouldn’t Military be securing the machines so they don’t get switched?

  • Thomas Fabian
    Posted at 19:30h, 07 November Reply

    The rats🐀 took the bait 🧀,heads will roll soon…. FBI,DOJ,NSA😆😆😆

  • Lentus Amor
    Posted at 07:33h, 09 November Reply

    In 2017, our electoral system was designated as “critical infrastructure”, and in 2018, Trump created the CYBERSECURITY & INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AGENCY (CISA.gov) to oversee American election integrity. They have a specific responsibility to the cybersecurity of American elections.

    CISA if fully aware of HAMMER/Scorecard, and will have been monitoring the machines used for vote tabulation in this election.

    This is a national security issue, with CISA, under DHS, responsible. Very different rules from DOJ law enforcement, with military assistance, surveillance, drones, undercover ops, etc.

    The consequences for attacking American critical infrastructure, as in attack on the electrical grid, for example, will be massive and severe.

  • Donna Davis
    Posted at 17:20h, 11 November Reply

    I heard on a news station today that HAMMER was bought and run out of Venezuela. Has anyone else heard that?

  • Ron Adams
    Posted at 18:10h, 11 November Reply

    Shawn Richard McCoy’s right,,,,,Trump must seize the computer Hammer and Scorecard and present it to supreme court. This is not going to stand in any case that creepy Joe is potus…

Post A Comment